« Vol. XV No.1 April 2020
INCREASING LEARNING MOTIVATION OF CHEMISTRY IN BASIC COMPETENCY EXPLAINING MAPTIPT ACCUT APPROACH MAKING A LEADING APPROACH MULTIPLE LEVEL POTENTIAL STUDENTS CLASS XII-IA-2 ODD SEMESTER IN SMA NEGERI 6 MADIUN, MADIUN CITY LESSON YEAR 2019/2020Marjuki (SMA Negeri 6 Madiun East Java Province)
AbstrakKata kunci : Learning Motivation, Map Making, Multipt Accut Approach
Those who are active are generally also active at previous meetings. In this second cycle, the average score of student mastery is increasing. By using the principle of Multipt Accut Approach (Learning Approach that develops all the potential learners) in this cycle I already shows mastery has increased, but the mastery that has been achieved it actually still needs to be improved again. This can be seen from the number of students who have achieved a mastery score of 65 or more. In table 4.2 can be obtained that only 63.27% of students who achieve mastery of 65 or more. While a group (class) said to be complete if the lowest 85% of students who achieve the score of mastery of 65 or more. The causes are still less students who achieve a mastery score of 65 or more, among which are active students are still dominated by certain students. The average was increased from 66.92 achieved in the first cycle to 73.84 in cycle II. It shows that students' mastery of teaching materials in cycle II is also increasing. Students' mastery of teaching materials in cycle II is quite high according to the category used. Increased mastery of students is an indicator that indicates that the form of learning that is done by using the principle of Multipt Accut Approach (Learning Approach that develops all potential learners) and diversity in the second cycle increasingly provide better results. Increased mastery of students is supported by the increasing median of the mastery scores achieved from the test results at the end of cycle II. In the second cycle median student's scores have reached 74.00. Median of that shows that from 49 people who took the test at the end of cycle II, can be obtained 24 students who achieve the highest mastery 74.00 and 30 students mastery of the lowest 74.00. The increase of median is in accordance with the results of observation at the time of learning took place. Where the students' attention in following the lessons is better than in the previous cycle. Students who do not understand the subject matter under discussion are given direct guidance. While who already understood about the subject matter being discussed, given the opportunity to express his opinion. Increased mastery of students is also marked with the emergence of responses related to the lesson material during the learning process takes place. The response generally indicates that the lesson material that has been discussed is understood and the students are able to know the relationship with the knowledge already possessed. In this last cycle, seen the average score of mastery of students still shows an increase. Increasing the average score of mastery that gives an indication that the mastery of students on the subject matter is also increasing in cycle III. herefore, the form of action performed on this cycle gives better results than the actions in the previous cycle. Increased mastery of students is also marked by the increasing number of students who achieve a mastery score of 65 or more. Students who achieve a score of 65 or more mastery as much as 85.11% and this shows that student mastery of learning materials in cycle III is very high. In addition, the class that became the subject of research has been completely classical in this last cycle. Forms of action performed on this cycle, can also bring students towards a change in attitude that is more supportive of the ongoing learning activities. Students in this cycle are more open in expressing their opinions. Even when randomly assigned to give answers, no more students can not answer correctly. Almost at every meeting there are no more students who can not follow the lesson. This is in line with student responses made at the end of cycle III. From those responses no more students are expecting an improved learning activity that has been done. From the results of achievement in the first cycle on average the results that can be achieved by students amounted to 63.63. (64%) It is still under the KKM standard which has been listed in the new academic year amounting to 75 (75%). So from the results of the learning process needs to be improved in cycle II and still stated Not Completed or Not Yet Successful. And from the results of achievements in cycle II on average the results that can be achieved by students of 73.1. (73%) It is still under the KKM standard which has been listed in the new academic year of 75 (75%). So from the results of the learning process needs to be improved in cycle III and still stated Not Completed or Not Yet Successful. And From the results of achievements in the third cycle on average student achievement of 83.6. (84%) It is still under the KKM standard which has been listed in the new academic year of 75 (75%). So from the results of the learning process No need to make improvements in the next cycle and still declared Completed or Successful.
Abstrak DOC Abstrak PDF Send to email Print Share on Facebook